Normal quantile plots

The normal quantile plot

  • see that normal distributions of data (or being normal enough) important
  • only tools we have to assess this are histograms and maybe boxplots
  • a better tool is normal quantile plot:
    • plot data against what you expect if data actually normal
    • look for points to follow a straight line, at least approx
  • ggplot code: aes sample; geoms stat_qq and stat_qq_line

Packages

The usual:

library(tidyverse)

Kids learning to read

Rows: 44
Columns: 2
$ group <chr> "t", "t", "t", "t", "t", "t", "t", "t", "t", "t", "t", "t", "t",…
$ score <dbl> 24, 61, 59, 46, 43, 44, 52, 43, 58, 67, 62, 57, 71, 49, 54, 43, …
ggplot(kids, aes(x = group, y = score)) + geom_boxplot()

Each group looks more or less normal, or at least close to symmetric.

Get the groups separately

kids %>% filter(group == "t") -> treatment
kids %>% filter(group == "c") -> control
treatment

to check

treatment %>% count(group)
control %>% count(group)

The treatment group

ggplot(treatment, aes(sample = score)) + 
  stat_qq() + stat_qq_line()

only problem here is lowest value a little too low (mild outlier).

Control group

ggplot(control, aes(sample = score)) + 
  stat_qq() + stat_qq_line()

This time, highest value a little too high, but again, no real problem with normality.

Facetting more than one sample

Use the whole data set and facet by groups

ggplot(kids, aes(sample = score)) + 
  stat_qq() + stat_qq_line() + facet_wrap(~group)

Blue Jays attendances, skewed to right

ggplot(jays, aes(x = attendance)) + geom_histogram(bins = 6)

On a normal quantile plot

ggplot(jays, aes(sample = attendance)) + 
  stat_qq() + stat_qq_line()
  • Attendances at low end too bunched up: skewed to right.
  • Right-skewness can also show up as highest values being too high, or as a curved pattern in the points.

More normal quantile plots

  • How straight does a normal quantile plot have to be?
  • There is randomness in real data, so even a normal quantile plot from normal data won’t look perfectly straight.
  • With a small sample, can look not very straight even from normal data.
  • Looking for systematic departure from a straight line; random wiggles ought not to concern us.
  • Look at some examples where we know the answer, so that we can see what to expect.

Normal data, large sample

d <- tibble(x=rnorm(200))
ggplot(d, aes(x=x)) + geom_histogram(bins=10)

The normal quantile plot

ggplot(d,aes(sample=x))+stat_qq()+stat_qq_line()

Normal data, small sample

  • Not so convincingly normal, but not obviously skewed:
d <- tibble(x=rnorm(20))
ggplot(d, aes(x=x)) + geom_histogram(bins=5)

The normal quantile plot

Good, apart from the highest and lowest points being slightly off. I’d call this good:

ggplot(d, aes(sample=x)) + stat_qq() + stat_qq_line()

Chi-squared data, df = 10

Somewhat skewed to right:

d <- tibble(x=rchisq(100, 10))
ggplot(d,aes(x=x)) + geom_histogram(bins=10)

The normal quantile plot

Somewhat opening-up curve:

ggplot(d,aes(sample=x))+stat_qq()+stat_qq_line()

Chi-squared data, df = 3

Definitely skewed to right:

d <- tibble(x=rchisq(100, 3))
ggplot(d, aes(x=x)) + geom_histogram(bins=10)

The normal quantile plot

Clear upward-opening curve:

ggplot(d,aes(sample=x))+stat_qq()+stat_qq_line()

t-distributed data, df = 3

Long tails (or a very sharp peak):

d <- tibble(x=rt(300, 3))
ggplot(d, aes(x=x)) + geom_histogram(bins=15)

The normal quantile plot

Low values too low and high values too high for normal.

ggplot(d,aes(sample=x))+stat_qq()+stat_qq_line()

Summary

On a normal quantile plot:

  • points following line (with some small wiggles): normal.
  • kind of deviation from a straight line indicates kind of nonnormality:
    • a few highest point(s) too high and/or lowest too low: outliers
    • else see how points at each end off the line:
High points
Low points Too low Too high
Too low Skewed left Long tails
Too high Short tails Skewed right
  • short-tailed distribution OK for \(t\) (mean still good), but others problematic (depending on sample size).